And the hearse has no springs,
"Rattle her bones (her bones)
By Andrea Blanco For Dailymail.Com
Published: | Updated:
A humiliated Meghan Markle wiped all references to her doomed Netflix animation 'Pearl' from her Archewell website after the series was axed by the streaming giant.
Pearl, the working title for the Markle-created show, was officially canceled last week as part of a wave of cutbacks prompted by Netflix's drop in subscribers.
A prior description of the series under the Archewell Productions subsection was nowhere to be found on Sunday,
'Like many girls her age, our heroine Pearl is on a journey of self-discovery as she tries to overcome life's daily challenges,' a now-removed quote from Meghan read.
It continued: 'I'm thrilled that Archewell Productions, partnered with the powerhouse platform of Netflix and these incredible producers, will together bring you this new animated series, which celebrates extraordinary women throughout history.
The quietly deleted references come a week after Netflix announced the cancelation of the animated show, in which Meghan was taking the role of executive producer along with David Furnish, Elton John's husband.
'Like many girls her age, our heroine Pearl is on a journey of self-discovery as she tries to overcome life's daily challenges,' a now-removed quote from Meghan read
Meghan Markle wiped all references to her doomed Netflix animation 'Pearl' from the Archewell website after the series was axed by the streaming giant
The show was officially canceled last week as part of a wave of cutbacks prompted by Netflix's drop in subscribers.
Pearl, which focused on 12-year-old Pearl's exploring achieving women throughout history, was only in the development stage.
The Archewell website now features 'Heart of Invictus,' a docu-series about competitors on their journey to the Invictus Games in The Hague in 2020, as the Duchess' sole active media project.
It is Meghan's and Harry's second attempt within a week to salvage their status, after the Queen sensationally banned the couple from appearing at the palace's balcony for Trooping the Colour, the start of the Jubilee commemorations.
The defiant Sussexes later revealed in a tweet via their friend and journalist Omid Scobie that they will still fly in from California - with Archie, three, and Lilibet, 11 months - for the events to mark the monarch's 70 years on the throne that begin on June 2.
Meghan and Prince Harry established Archewell Productions in the autumn of 2020 to create scripted series, docu-series, documentaries, features, and children's programming.
Pearl was expected to be the first animated series created by the production company.
It was set to see a young girl inspired by Meghan - whose name means 'pearl' in Welsh - take on various social injustices, while highlighting the work of feminist icons.
It is Meghan's and Harry's second attempt within a week to salvage their status, after the Queen sensationally banned the couple from appearing at the palace's balcony for Trooping the Colour, the start of the Jubilee commemorations. Above, Meghan, Harry and the Queen pictured during Trooping the Colour in 2018
Despite dropping Pearl, insiders claimed Netflix remains optimistic about the Archewell deal and has several projects planned, including a documentary series called Heart of Invictus, which follows the recent Invictus Games.
Netflix made several cuts in late April and early May, including dropping two other children's shows and firing staff.
The streaming service scratched Dino Daycare, which was created by Jeff King, and the South Asian-inspired adventure Boons and Curses. Both shows were already in production.
Sources familiar with the cancellations told Deadline that Netflix had warned producers to take projects still in the development stage elsewhere.
It is unclear if they offered Archewell Productions similar advice. The streaming giant shelled out a $100million in the deal with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in September 2020.
As of yet, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are yet to produce any published content for the streaming giant. But the company has pinned hopes that their upcoming series documenting the recent Invictus Games will prove value for the money.
Meghan announced the now-canceled program last July. She was taking on the roles of 'creator and executive producer' - marking the first time the former actress and Suits star would work in the position of EP.
Filmmaker David Furnish, husband to musician Elton John, was also expected to serve as an executive producer on the series.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are yet to produce any published content for the Netflix. But the company has pinned hopes that their upcoming series documenting the recent Invictus Games will prove value for the money
It comes as the streaming behemoth has lost 200,000 subscribers in just three months, while shareholders of the US firm have been warned to expect another two million subscribers to leave in the three months to July
Meghan said Pearl would 'weave together fantasy and history' while focusing 'on the adventures of a 12-year-old girl' as she attempts to 'overcome life's daily challenges'.
While few details had been released about the series, many believed the show was based - at least in part - on Meghans own childhood, citing how she named the show and its title character Pearl, the original meaning of her name.
The name Meghan originated in Wales, where it is traditionally spelled Megan, however, it originally came from the Greek name Margaret, derived from the word margaritēs, which translates to 'pearl'.
Pearl was not the first time that Markle has seemingly chosen to draw on her own life as the inspiration for her professional projects - something that she did most recently with her debut children's book The Bench, which was firmly panned by readers on both sides of the Atlantic.
Meanwhile, over half of Netflix's own reality TV shows and dramas released in 2018 have not been commissioned for a second series, compared with more than a third launched in 2017 and 28 percent in 2016, The Times reported.
By Danyal
Hussain For Mailonline
Meghan Markle saw
they were 'deals to be made' as a royal and couldn't resist what was offer at
the 'celebrity buffet', ex-Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown has
claimed.
Appearing on
Washington Post Live today to promote her new book 'The Palace Papers', Ms
Brown, who was Princess
Diana's diarist, said the Duchess
of Sussex has 'no purpose' and wanted to 'cash in' on the commercial
arm of being a royal.
Discussing Harry and
Meghan's exit from royal life, she said: 'They wanted to be able to have a
commercial arm to their activities. That was the stumbling block. Meghan certainly
saw the deals that were there to be made because they were royals.
'It's as though she
couldn't resist everything that was on offer on the celebrity buffet.
'A hunger to avail
herself of the global leverage, to live in glorious houses without strings
attached.'
Ms Brown suggested
that Meghan was inspired by Michelle Obama and wanted to have the wealth as
well as the stature. However, she also insisted that Harry would have wanted to
leave the royal family even without Meghan.
'I really think
Harry wanted out, himself. Meghan gave Harry the tools to leave. She understood
the world of agents and deals. I mean this wasn't Harry's world, but suddenly
he had in Meghan a very worldly strategist who he decided to trust above all
the other advisors.'
The couple have
struggled since leaving the royal family, Ms Brown believes. She thinks Meghan
is finding it difficult to find a 'brand' and the
She said: 'They both
completely underestimated what it was going to be like to be without the palace
platform.
'Meghan doesn't
really have a brand – you feel that she is grasping at the 'Twitter caring' of
the moment. Vaccinations,
'And the whole
problem, with entertainment deal is you have to produce. They've signed with
Netflix but what have we seen? Nothing.
'Creating
entertainment that works is very hard to do. Their Spotify podcast is going
nowhere. Netflix is not doing so well are they going to renew that contract?'
Ms Brown also
discussed why Meghan would have struggled so much after joining the royal
family.
She suggested: 'She
was suddenly completely dependent on her husband for money and he was
completely dependent on the bank of dad – Charles and at the same time had to
ask Granny for one of the houses on the royal estates to live.
'That kind of
infantilizing was very maddening to Meghan.
'I think the queen
and the palace set them up for a lot of success. She gave her patron of the
National Theatre and vice chairman of the commonwealth foundation – no better
platform to talk about women's education and the question of minorities.'
Her latest comments
come after she previously claimed Meghan
would not want to return to the UK for more than a fleeting visit if
Harry mends his relationship with his father and brother because 'she disliked
England',
Ms Brown has said
she believes Prince
Harry may even want to make a sensational return to the Royal Family
after the
Queen's death - splitting his time between
Ms Brown has
described Megxit as a 'disaster for both sides' and claimed Harry and Meghan
caused 'maximum mayhem' when leaving the Royal Family
because they are 'addicted to drama'.
She said: 'I think
that Harry is going to want to come back when the Queen dies to serve his
country. And I think they will find a way to reel him in. And it's possible
that Meghan - maybe they will have a commuter arrangement. I don't know. I
don't see Meghan ever wanting to go back. She disliked
Ms Brown claimed
that the British public are 'very very sad' about Megxit, because they took
Harry to their hearts and also tried to support him when he found love with
Meghan. Ms Brown also labelled Prince Harry a 'very impetuous man' and
revealed how Palace advisors 'always thought he would leave'.
'So it was actually very, very sad for everybody that it went so wrong because they actually need Harry and Meghan now. You should see, the Queen is failing, and she's very frail. They kind of need Harry and Meghan to bring that star power and to be on the balcony at the Jubilee. We have to have a royal family up there. We can't have Andrew up there.'
Harry and Meghan arrived in Britain after an overnight British Airways flight from Los Angeles. They did not bring their children, Archie, two, and ten-month-old Lilibet – who the Queen has still not met.
They were driven to Frogmore where they spent the night. After his failure to attend his grandfather's memorial service last month – amid an ongoing legal row with the Home Office over the removal of his police protection – Harry's offer to visit the Queen was being viewed as an olive branch.
But the Duke of Sussex upset palace officials and reportedly his father and brother after claiming part of his visit was motivated by 'making sure she's protected and got the right people around her.'
Harry went on to claim that the Queen tells him things she feels she cannot tell anyone else.
He said: 'We have a really special relationship. We talk about things that she can't talk about with anybody else. So that's always a nice piece to it.'
First Sounds strives to make humanity's earliest sound recordings available to all people for all time.
First Sounds seeks out the world's oldest sound recordings—wherever they are.
We rewrote history in 2008 when we discovered and resurrected humanity’s first recordings of its own voice, created in 1860 in Paris by Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville. Since then, we have identified and played back even older recordings. First Sounds remains the authority on Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville and his recordings.
First Sounds is dedicated to audio preservation.
We have digitally preserved every airborne sound recording known to exist from before 1861, plus many recordings made thereafter.
First Sounds pioneered the playback of the oldest sound recordings in 2007 and has been in the forefront ever since.
Sound recordings made before the invention of the phonograph were not intended to be played back. Extracting their sounds remains our specialty.
First Sounds is collaborative.
David Giovannoni, Patrick Feaster, Meagan Hennessey, and Richard Martin founded First Sounds in 2007 to facilitate, coordinate, and promote the efforts of individuals who share their passions and of organizations that share their goals. First Sounds is unincorporated; we neither solicit nor accept financial donations.
First Sounds offers free and universal access to its work.
We believe humanity's earliest sound recordings are the patrimony of all mankind. We present them here under a Creative Commons Attribution (BY) license which conveys certain privileges and responsibilities. We encourage everyone everywhere to study and enjoy them.
Email us at info@firstsounds.org.
By Richard
Kay and Barbara Mcmahon For The Daily MailPublished:
With its bucking broncos, yee-hawing cowboys and pitchers of cold beer,
the Fort Worth Stockyards is a rowdy and testosterone-fuelled throwback to the
old days of the American West.
While today tourists
throng the mule and horse-barns that were once the last 'civilised' outpost for
livestock traders on Texas's
famous
Last weekend,
however, there was another spectacle at the first night of its championship
rodeo — a Stetson-wearing Prince Harry.
Judging by the
photographs posted online — before they were mysteriously deleted — the Duke of
Sussex did not look entirely comfortable.
Perhaps it was the gushing posts that appeared on Instagram. 'We get a lot of rodeo royalty but this is the first prince I've seen,' enthused Cory Melton, a muscular wrangler who breeds bucking bulls.
Yet his genial
observation — which also claimed that Harry was going to enter the bull-riding
competition but had lost his 'rigging bag', an essential piece of rodeo kit —
was swiftly removed.
As, too, was a
message brimming with Southern hospitality from rodeo secretary Cindy Reid, in
which she generously thanked Harry for his visit.
No doubt some will
wonder if an event reeking of 'toxic masculinity' might sit uneasily with Harry's
image as the self-appointed Prince of Woke. But was there, perhaps, another
explanation why he might not be pleased to see pictures of himself at the
so-called 'Cowtown coliseum'?
The visit coincided
almost exactly with the first anniversary of his and Meghan's Oprah Winfrey
interview from which, we were assured, a 'global wave of service' would be
unleashed by the couple.
An appearance at a
kitsch tourist attraction can hardly be described as an illustration of their
'shared commitment' to a life of good works. Indeed, the embers of their
incendiary claims about cruelty, neglect, snobbery and racism aimed at the
heart of the Royal Family are still glowing.
More than 50 million
people around the world — including 12 million in Britain and 17 million in the
U.S. — tuned in to hear Meghan discuss how royal life had made her suicidal,
blame sister-in-law Kate for making her cry at a bridesmaids' dress-fitting
and, infamously, allege that a member of the Royal Family had questioned what
colour her son Archie's skin would be.
The repercussions are still being felt as are the memorably damning soundbites: 'Were you silent, or were you silenced?'; 'My family literally cut me off financially'; and complaints that Archie 'won't be given security, he's not going to be given a title'.
More significantly,
12 months after the so-called 'interview of the decade', we are entitled to ask
what on earth a couple who set themselves the loftiest of standards has
actually been doing since — apart from overseeing the stream of platitudes and
wearily right-on slogans that are issued with monotonous regularity from the
luxury of their nine-bedroom, 16-bathroom mansion?
Take, for example,
their attendance at last month's National Association for the Advancement of
Colored People Image Awards, where they accepted the President's Award that
recognises special achievement and distinguished public service.
Over the years this
venerable organisation — set up in 1909 in response to violence against black
people — has handed its most prestigious award to some significant individuals,
who have done much to raise the aspirations of America's black population, from
boxer Muhammad Ali to preacher-turned-politician Jesse Jackson and former U.S.
Secretaries of State Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice.
Yet according to the
citation, they received this honour for 'heeding the call to social justice'
and 'joining the struggle for equity' in
Doubtless it was
merely a coincidence that the media for the awards was organised by Sunshine
Sachs, the New York-based public relations outfit that has been advising Meghan
since her days as an actress.
Activism, of course,
is part of the identity the couple have moulded for themselves since abandoning
their royal lives for
But for all this and
other high-minded declarations, the 'shared purpose and global action' has not
quite materialised.
But what has it
accomplished? According to reports, the initiative has since gone rather quiet.
There is one area,
of course, where there has not been silence — the various legal battles they
have fought with newspapers and broadcasters including The Mail on Sunday, The
Sun and the BBC, and more recently, the Home Office, which Harry is suing over
the loss of their police protection in the UK, for which he has offered to pay.
It is only fair to
point out that the main event in the
The Queen has still
not met the great-granddaughter given her family nickname and it is not clear
when that situation will change.
We now know Harry
and Meghan will not attend the thanksgiving service for Prince Philip later
this month and their presence at June's Platinum Jubilee celebrations — which
coincides with Lilibet's first birthday — is increasingly uncertain. In fact,
relations between the
If anything, they have worsened. Harry's revelation that he has collaborated with a ghostwriter on a tell-all memoir, due out this autumn, has spread a deep anxiety across the royal household.
A well-placed source
this week told the Mail that the Royal Family were 'absolutely dreading' its
publication. 'God knows what one-eyed nonsense will be in it,' the source said.
The fear that its contents could overshadow the Queen's anniversary is more
intense than those that surrounded Prince Andrew before he settled his
sex-abuse lawsuit.
We understand that
recent reports that Harry and his father are in frequent contact are wide of
the mark. Prince Charles is often unavailable when his son calls and, because
he does not have a mobile phone, Harry relies on officials to patch him through
when he does ring. And that is often not possible.
This is an
extraordinary case of history repeating itself. At the height of the marital
differences between Harry's parents, Princess Diana was similarly thwarted in
phone calls to both Charles and other senior royals.
And in both cases
there has been an issue of trust. Thirty years ago, Charles never forgave Diana
for leaking intimate family secrets to author Andrew Morton. Now, Palace aides
believe Harry could damage Charles's hopes of making his wife, the Duchess of
Cornwall, his queen if he raises new questions about her role in the break-up
of his father and mother's marriage.
Pointedly, Harry was
silent when the Queen announced her stated wish that Camilla should be her
son's queen when the time comes — rather than a mere princess consort as was
originally planned
There has been at
least one phone call between Charles and his son where voices were raised.
As a friend of
Charles says: 'Simply put, the worry is how on earth will things be resolved if
Harry is unkind about Camilla.'
As for Harry's
relationship with his brother, that has still not recovered from the Oprah
interview — and the allegations (still being investigated) that Meghan had
bullied royal staff, something that Meghan's lawyers have denied.
Whether the Duchess
of Sussex ever returns to
Glimpses even in the
Television is, of
course, crucial to the
So what else have
they done since that Oprah spectacular? Have they achieved even one of their
ambitions, or has it been a year of living aimlessly?
The answer,
according to our audit, suggests accomplishments have been scant. Two weeks
after Oprah, Harry was unveiled as 'chief impact officer' for mental 'wellness'
app BetterUp, described as 'a platform for coaching and mental fitness' in the
workplace.
On May 3, the duke
was a participant on stage at the 'Vax Live' awareness concert at the SoFi
stadium in
A fortnight later he
was happily filmed going through therapy on an Apple TV+ series that focused on
the importance of mental health. Four days after the birth of their daughter,
Meghan published her children's book The Bench, with hundreds of copies given
away free to schools and children's libraries across the
Although it became a
New York Times bestseller within a week of release, overall sales are said to
be disappointing. Certainly, it has not been flying off shelves at the couple's
local book store, Tecolote in Montecito. A store saleswoman was reported
saying: 'Meghan has never come into the shop.'
On July 1, Harry was
in
World events rarely
pass without some kind of intervention from the
So far so
predictable. Making the cover of Time magazine's 100 Most Influential People
issue last September was surely validation for all their endeavours.
Next stop
Intriguingly, their
participation came after Global Citizen was named Organisation of the Year at
the 2021 American Business Awards — nominated by none other than . . . Sunshine
Sachs.
Six weeks later, the
couple were back in the Big Apple for the November 11 Salute to Freedom gala,
which honoured military veterans and to which Harry wore his insignia as a
Knight Commander of the Royal Victorian Order (KCVO), a medal he received from
the Queen.
That same month,
Meghan was criticised for using her royal title to lobby
Then came the
couple's Christmas card — showing the first photo of their daughter — and its
cheesy message: 'Archie made us a Mama and Papa, and Lili made us a family.'
In February, Harry
opened up to BetterUp about how he sets aside 45 minutes a day to 'build
resilience' and meditate. He admitted to 'burning the candle at both ends'
before he learnt how to embrace what he described as 'inner work'.
All in all, the
couple's schedule hardly compares with the daily work of the royals they left
behind.
So might this
indicate they have been busier in their private lives?
Last month,
accompanied by his cousin Princess Eugenie, Harry was photographed at the Super
Bowl in
But sightings in
their neighbourhood are rare. Harry has been spotted pootling on an electric
bike while being trailed by his security team and also at the wheel of his
Range Rover. He has also been seen buying groceries while Meghan was spotted in
December carrying bags from the Pierre LaFond delicatessen.
They did attend the
town's July 4 parade. But according to Sharon Byrne of the Montecito
Association, 'no one knew it was them'. And they contributed as sponsors for
Montecito's Christmas parade.
With so few local
appearances, rumours circulated that they may even have moved out — but this
does not appear to be the case.
Certainly, locals
are protective of their celebrity residents.
For example when
reporter Richard Mineards revealed that Archie had taken his first riding
lesson, he did not name the upmarket stables he attended.
But it's always been
that way in Montecito. There are no 'maps to the stars' or tour buses past their
homes, as in
A neighbour who has
lived near the
The bodyguards who
constantly patrol the couple's perimeter fence in golf carts are far more
visible.
Only Harry and
Meghan can say whether a year that began with the hype and rage of their Oprah
interview has turned out quite how they intended.
On the face of it, however, it doesn't seem to have added up to much.