Tuesday, April 25, 2017
This is me in '89
You can tell everything about a vacation spot from its postcards. Can't you? In this case, Washington State is all about Really Big Fish.
"Are you sure this isn't Vancouver?" I asked my husband as the rain bucketed down. One grows an amphibious skin after awhile in these climes, but it's still depressing on vacation.
When it's not about Really Big Fish, Washington is about Really Big Logs, or else the men are the size of ants. Actually, this COULD be a real log. I've heard they have Really Big Trees.
I haven't written about Bigfoot yet, but I'm going to. For a while, two of the grandgirls were obsessed with him, and the whole family would watch Finding Bigfoot to gales of laughter. There are actually people who are Squatchers or Sasquologists, or whatever they call them. Bigfooters? Privately funded, I assume.
Slugs are another feature of Washington, though they're no bigger than the footlong banana-boat suckers we have around here. The first time I saw one, I wondered who had run over an anaconda. There were guts everywhere. This card reminds me a bit of the creepy artwork of Robert Crumb. It's something to do with a Gold Slug Card.
Why did I keep these?
At any rate, here we are in Washington State, in the town of LaConner, home of Tom Robbins. Did I ever look like this? I'm practically a kid, and my kids (now in their 40s) are zygotes.
The atmosphere was fishy, froggy, amphibious. Wet. Wet, wet, wet.
Since Humptulips was mentioned in Tom Robbins' Another Roadside Attraction, I wanted to see if it really existed. It wasn't much, but I just had to be there. The nicest photo, in which I'm kneeling before the Humptulips sign, is gone. I gave it away. I got hooked into a Chain Art thing, a piece of nonsense that operated kind of like a chain letter. I dutifully sent off my poem about Humptulips, with photo, and never heard from anybody. Ever. It was eating lunch alone in the school cafeteria, all over again.
I do wonder, sometimes (no I don't - I've forgotten all about it) whatever happened to the plans for Humptulips Valley Church. Maybe I should look it up. A lot has happened since 1989. For one thing, I've gained - umm - I don't want to think how many pounds. But I think I was on the too-thin side here and probably boomeranged, or bounced.
The second-nicest photo of me standing by the Humptulips sign. The other one was discarded like a piece of trash. If you wanted a second print of something in those days, you had to rifle through a whole pile of slippery brown negatives and hold them up to the light, going, "No. . . no. . . no. . . ", until you got sick of the whole thing and gave up.
And I apologize for any log-disparaging remarks I made: just look at this one! Jesus Christ, how do they MAKE logs this big? It looks as if it could swallow me up.
Romance in LaConner. Both of us looking ridiculously young.
I always try to find the community papers in any new place, because they tell you what's really going on. I kept a few memorable clippings, orange with age, but God these were hard to get into any sort of shape to post. I had to scan them, then sort of cut them apart, and the typeface ended up every different size. I especially like the Police Blotter - sounds like something out of Mayberry - and the lovely birthday tribute to Granmummu. I also like the fact that the Aberdeen News is called. . .
POST-BLOG BLISS! I found that photo of the Humptulips sign! I must have made an extra copy of it, after all. I wish I had kept the accompanying poem that was meant to fulfill my obligation for "chain art". I got absolutely nothing back, and lost the poem. BUT I STILL HAVE THIS.
Miss Sadist's School of Tightlacing
From the “Sheffield
Independent” July 18th 1896 :
SMALL WAISTS AND EDUCATION.
Nowadays, when almost every pastime is being annexed
to the use of girls and women, and when, if we fully believe the more advanced
ones of the sex we are within a reasonable distance of the day when the
petticoat and skirt will be abolished in favour of the knickerbocker, at least
when taking exercise, the manner in which girls were trained for their after
positions in life at fashionable finishing schools forty years, or rather less,
ago, will, says “Hearth and Home,” surely prove interesting reading, though,
perhaps, almost incredible.
Not long ago, among a number of old books, the
writer came across a diary of school-girl life from which extracts have been
made showing how the girls are turned out in one (the conventional) mould
without regard for differences of either disposition or temperament. Nothing
could be plainer than the entries of the diary itself; and in the light of
modern feminine development it becomes a valuable, if a frivolous, “human
document.” Let it speak for itself.
“August 15, 1858 . — I am fifteen years
of age to-day, and I haven't a lover. Margery has two, she tells me, but then
she has such a very, very tiny waist— l can easily span it— and Mary tells me,
when I say my new stays pinch me, that young ladies ought not to mind how much
they are pinched in, because if they intend to make a good marriage they must
have a jimp, small waist. Perhaps it is Margery's waist has got her a lover,
for she is not sixteen quite.”
“September 27 (same year)— At last I am at school. I
have been here three days; how long they have seemed away from little Bob,
mother, and Kathleen. What a wasp-waisted lot we are, all except myself and the
one or two other new girls; but we have all been measured, and when Mrs. B—
sends out her stays from Brighton I suppose we shall be pulled in like the
rest, and be laced up till we can scarcely breathe. What the girls hate (and
what I shall hate, too) is never being allowed to loosen, except for the bath
on Saturdays. And then, I have never worn stays at night.
Last night I could
hear Madge T— groaning in her sleep; she said she hardly slept at all, her new
stays cut her so horribly. She has been here more than two years, and Mrs. M—
says she has a lovely little waist— it is only 15 inches — and that though
Madge could scarcely walk or breathe sometimes, she will have a perfect figure
when she leaves at Christmas. Madge told me all about poor Sarah W—, who used
to faint, and whose mother fetched her away. But Mrs. M— doesn't allow it to be
talked about.”
“September 30. — Margery is in disgrace. Mlle.
V— found a note she had dropped from Harry. Madame M— is very angry at
the very idea of a lover, although, after all, she is always telling us girls, if
we complain of our stays pinching us, or that Marie or Mademoiselle hurt us
when they rub our chests to make us develop, on Wednesday and Saturday
mornings, that we must have good figures and small waists, so that we can make
good marriages. Madge tells me that Violet S— and some of the other girls in
her room— the bigger ones, of course — wear poultices very often at night to
make them plump.”
“November 7. — This morning was ‘corset parade,’ as
we girls call it. Madame, before we put on skirt and bodice, came round with
the measurement book in her hand accompanied by Mademoiselle, tape in hand.
Martha W— got into rare trouble; she had been faint in the night and obliged to
loosen. She did not lace up again quite as small as she should have, hence
Madame's anger. Amy T— was much commended, though she was white as death till
she put on rouge, because she was only fifteen inches. How she panted and
gasped while Margery and I laced her in.
I am always a good girl, Madame says,
though I don't pull myself in till I'm almost strangled, but content myself
with seventeen inches — which, alas, Madame says must be sixteen by Christmas.
I often laugh and say we girls are entered up like pieces of furniture, or
something of that sort. Madame always reads out each entry from the book as
each of us are ‘paraded.’ Mine was ‘Figure satisfactory, waist ditto; to be
reduced to sixteen by December 18th; bust improved, but to be frictioned three
times a week with linseed oil. Two pairs of new stays to be ordered from Madame
B made extra stiff.’ Heigh-ho wee me, and I suppose I shall be a little more
uncomfortable than before.”
Then a year after comes the following entry: — “How
delightful to be home for good. Nurse is charmed with my figure, and says she
is sure Captain W— admires it. He was watching me all across the lawn to-day
while they were playing croquet. I can scarcely eat anything when laced in like
I am, but she says girls don't want to eat much, and mother [says] that many
women ruin their figures by eating.”
Monday, April 24, 2017
Where is Humptulips?
"Humptulips, I hear you calling. Humptulips never sounded better. Humptulips sounds like it is Papeete, Tahiti, or the French Riviera. O Humptulips, shimmering pearl of the Mediterranean! I love thee, Humptulips, even though there is not one Dutch girl in thy whole domain."
Tom Robbins, Another Roadside Attraction
Genetic mysteries
I came from what is sometimes called a "musical family". We weren't exactly the von Trapps, but my father was choir leader of our church (putting on such ambitious productions as Handel's Messiah), and both parents were deeply involved in Gilbert and Sullivan light operas. My father played violin decently, though I don't think he ever left first position. My mother was so indoctrinated with musical expectation that she often expressed shame that she did not know how to play the piano. It somehow would have made everything so much better.
So when WE came along, of course, it was the same thing, except that the pressure was far worse. The expectation wasn't just competence or even excellence, but a world-class career. Joy had nothing to do with it. I'd say we had a moderate amount of talent. My sister had a warm mezzo voice which might have taken her to a career if she hadn't early-on wrecked her life. My brother Arthur was a talented flautist and guitarist, and also a schizophrenic, who ended up panhandling on the streets of Toronto (not to mention prostituting himself) before he died in a fire.
My brother Walt was the only one to actually apply his talent, teaching and playing oboe in an orchestra in the Okanagan. Not exactly the big time, and he had to supplement his income with being an accountant on the side (work he claimed to prefer). His two daughters ended up as professional string players, an interesting development (their mother being an orchestral musician).
Then there was me, so bad at the piano that my teacher came to my mother and said, "This child is unteachable". Since no one else in the family would touch the violin, I was "it" and was just dismal at it. It was only much later that I discovered or uncovered a voice that had been totally buried by my sister's histrionics. I was afraid to open my mouth before that.
(Strangely enough, at age 40, I had the mad desire to take another crack at the violin, and I did. I found a magnificent teacher and played for nine years, including a lot of public performing. What does this mean? I am not sure, but I wanted to take the instrument back and approach it on my own terms.)
My kids came along early in my life, and not only did they show no signs of musical talent in any area, they were completely disdainful of it. I remember they called Pavarotti "Pavarotten". They excelled in sports - were champions, in fact, which baffled and surprised and delighted Bill and I. We were both hopeless klutzes and literally dropped the ball.
But then. . .
A lo-o-o-ng time later came my grandkids, and I sensed musicality in all of them right from the start. They have sung in choirs, played instruments in bands, and, most of all, danced - every kind of dance from ballet to jazz to tap to hip-hop, a discipline which demands being one with all types of music. All three grandgirls have excelled at it. Two of them are off in Vernon winning trophies at a competition even as we speak. (One grandgirl has no hearing on one side, demanding extreme listening skills and a focus that simply amazes me.)
And look at Ryan, adorable, his instrument a foot longer than he is! He caught his hand in the slide one day, an excruciating thing that demanded a trip to Emergency, but he went right back at it as soon as he was healed.
So what am I getting at? I was amazed at my kids and their ability to master any sport, the trophies crowding the bookshelves in their rooms. If any part of it was genetic, it must have been several generations back. But the music thing was there - at least on one side. Did it leap over the barrier, or is this just serendipity? I don't know, but it's gratifying to see .
And of course, it just hit me that dance requires athleticism as well as musical knowledge. The alchemy of genetics never ceases to amaze me.
Remember the Rolls-Royce guru?
I knew I had kept a scrapbook, and that there were some crazy things in it - some of the weirdest postcards I've ever seen, and great stuff from the local newspapers. I remembered something particularly weird that I'd read in the LaConner paper. The memory of it was recently dredged up by a book I'm reading for at least the fourth time.
The article in the Channel Town Press, which I initially tried to take seriously, is about a fictional guru trying to set up shop with his Rolls-Royces and harem of wives/kids in LaConner. After a while I realized it was satire. I thought it was funny, especially Bag One's drawn-on beard (this was long before photoshop) and the Bag Dad Middle School.
It was years later that I reviewed a book for the Vancouver paper called The Promise of Paradise - a woman's intimate story of the perils of life with Rajneesh. This is the one that I keep reading over and over again. The one I'm reading right now.
Rajneesh, as in Bhagwan, the "Rolls-Royce Guru", built an incredibly wealthy worldwide empire which embodied all that is wrong with mass religion. Bhagwan's devotees had taken over a piece of land called Big Muddy Ranch near the small town of Antelope, Oregon. By the time this grotesque empire collapsed in a state of near-terrorism, the newly-created city of Rajneeshpuram was in an armed standoff with the citizens of Antelope. The erstwhile leader of the cult, a demented demigod named Sheela, was eventually charged with election fraud (rounding up homeless people to vote for sympathetic representation in local elections), poisoning hundreds of citizens, and a host of other crimes. By this time, Rajneeshpuram was being patrolled by armed guards dressed in camouflage. The utopia had become a police state.
Thousands of people drank this particular flavour of Koolaid, in particular the author of The Promise of Paradise, Satya Bharti Franklin (given a new name, as per usual, when she joined the cult). Even as chaos and violence and death swirled around her, she kept writing about "waves of bliss" washing over her, and about how, in spite of everything (even abandoning her kids), her fourteen years with this self-righteous fucked-up power-tripping bastard had all been worth it.
I think LaConner must have felt the shock waves from this bizarre episode of cult aggression. It had all come too close for comfort, but they still had the good grace to joke about it. The piece was written only a couple of years after the meltdown became public knowledge. To quote Wikipedia: "The subsequent criminal investigation, the largest in Oregon history, confirmed that a secretive group had, unbeknownst to both government officials and nearly all Rajneeshpuram residents, engaged in a variety of criminal activities, including the attempted murder of Rajneesh's physician, wiretapping and bugging within the commune and within Rajneesh's home, poisonings of two public officials, and arson."
To me, this smacks of the "but we didn't know what was going on" claim of the German population after World War II. According to her detailed account based on private journals, Satya Bharti Franklin knew what was going on, and did not walk away from it. By then she felt a kind of paralysis which was widespread. Did they know what was going on? They knew enough.
I'm not sure why I keep reading about cults - oh, of course I do, they are bloody fascinating! These people did not question Sheela or Rajneesh or any of it, no matter how nasty or ludicrous the edicts became, but kept on humbly obeying. If they didn't, they weren't "surrendered" enough. Imagine an environment, a community, in which the ultimate goal is to surrender. To give up: personal freedom, sanity, decision-making, life.
Anyway, I kept the Bag One clipping even before I knew anything at all about Bhagwan or Sheela or Satya Bharti Franklin, because I loved it. It was all part of the Washingtonian nuttiness I had come to cherish.
But what of those throngs in red skirts, the faithful sanyassins who had given years of their lives (not to mention all their worldly goods) to this crazy creep? Did they just go on to some other prophet, tin god, addiction? How many of them joined Scientology? There must be a cult mind, and I must figure out what it is, because in spite of everything I have seen, it makes no sense to me at all.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)