Friday, April 29, 2022
Thursday, April 28, 2022
Little Apricot is queen of the adult stall!
Wednesday, April 27, 2022
Tuesday, April 26, 2022
Meghan and Harry: straight from the author`s mouth
Meghan saw there were deals to be made
because they were royals': Ex-Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown says former actress
couldn't resist what was on offer 'at the celebrity buffet'
- Tina Brown said Meghan desired to have wealth and
stature like Michelle Obama
- The former Vanity Fair editor also claimed Meghan
wanted to 'cash in' on royalty
- However, she said Prince Harry would have left
the royals even without Meghan
By Danyal
Hussain For Mailonline
Meghan Markle saw
they were 'deals to be made' as a royal and couldn't resist what was offer at
the 'celebrity buffet', ex-Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown has
claimed.
Appearing on
Washington Post Live today to promote her new book 'The Palace Papers', Ms
Brown, who was Princess
Diana's diarist, said the Duchess
of Sussex has 'no purpose' and wanted to 'cash in' on the commercial
arm of being a royal.
Discussing Harry and
Meghan's exit from royal life, she said: 'They wanted to be able to have a
commercial arm to their activities. That was the stumbling block. Meghan certainly
saw the deals that were there to be made because they were royals.
'It's as though she
couldn't resist everything that was on offer on the celebrity buffet.
'A hunger to avail
herself of the global leverage, to live in glorious houses without strings
attached.'
Ms Brown suggested
that Meghan was inspired by Michelle Obama and wanted to have the wealth as
well as the stature. However, she also insisted that Harry would have wanted to
leave the royal family even without Meghan.
'I really think
Harry wanted out, himself. Meghan gave Harry the tools to leave. She understood
the world of agents and deals. I mean this wasn't Harry's world, but suddenly
he had in Meghan a very worldly strategist who he decided to trust above all
the other advisors.'
The couple have
struggled since leaving the royal family, Ms Brown believes. She thinks Meghan
is finding it difficult to find a 'brand' and the
She said: 'They both
completely underestimated what it was going to be like to be without the palace
platform.
'Meghan doesn't
really have a brand – you feel that she is grasping at the 'Twitter caring' of
the moment. Vaccinations,
'And the whole
problem, with entertainment deal is you have to produce. They've signed with
Netflix but what have we seen? Nothing.
'Creating
entertainment that works is very hard to do. Their Spotify podcast is going
nowhere. Netflix is not doing so well are they going to renew that contract?'
Ms Brown also
discussed why Meghan would have struggled so much after joining the royal
family.
She suggested: 'She
was suddenly completely dependent on her husband for money and he was
completely dependent on the bank of dad – Charles and at the same time had to
ask Granny for one of the houses on the royal estates to live.
'That kind of
infantilizing was very maddening to Meghan.
'I think the queen
and the palace set them up for a lot of success. She gave her patron of the
National Theatre and vice chairman of the commonwealth foundation – no better
platform to talk about women's education and the question of minorities.'
Her latest comments
come after she previously claimed Meghan
would not want to return to the UK for more than a fleeting visit if
Harry mends his relationship with his father and brother because 'she disliked
England',
Ms Brown has said
she believes Prince
Harry may even want to make a sensational return to the Royal Family
after the
Queen's death - splitting his time between
Ms Brown has
described Megxit as a 'disaster for both sides' and claimed Harry and Meghan
caused 'maximum mayhem' when leaving the Royal Family
because they are 'addicted to drama'.
She said: 'I think
that Harry is going to want to come back when the Queen dies to serve his
country. And I think they will find a way to reel him in. And it's possible
that Meghan - maybe they will have a commuter arrangement. I don't know. I
don't see Meghan ever wanting to go back. She disliked
Ms Brown claimed
that the British public are 'very very sad' about Megxit, because they took
Harry to their hearts and also tried to support him when he found love with
Meghan. Ms Brown also labelled Prince Harry a 'very impetuous man' and
revealed how Palace advisors 'always thought he would leave'.
'So it was actually very, very sad for everybody that it went so wrong because they actually need Harry and Meghan now. You should see, the Queen is failing, and she's very frail. They kind of need Harry and Meghan to bring that star power and to be on the balcony at the Jubilee. We have to have a royal family up there. We can't have Andrew up there.'
Harry and Meghan arrived in Britain after an overnight British Airways flight from Los Angeles. They did not bring their children, Archie, two, and ten-month-old Lilibet – who the Queen has still not met.
They were driven to Frogmore where they spent the night. After his failure to attend his grandfather's memorial service last month – amid an ongoing legal row with the Home Office over the removal of his police protection – Harry's offer to visit the Queen was being viewed as an olive branch.
But the Duke of Sussex upset palace officials and reportedly his father and brother after claiming part of his visit was motivated by 'making sure she's protected and got the right people around her.'
Harry went on to claim that the Queen tells him things she feels she cannot tell anyone else.
He said: 'We have a really special relationship. We talk about things that she can't talk about with anybody else. So that's always a nice piece to it.'
Monday, April 25, 2022
🤫PRINCE HARRY SNEAKS INTO THE UK.
Sunday, April 24, 2022
I am too upset to write about this - so I will let someone else.
Port Coquitlam residents witnessed a number of healthy, mature trees being removed from Veterans Park and Leigh Square in Port Coquitlam on March 15 and 16, with more still to come down, this letter writer states.
Letter to the Editor Mar 17, 2022 4:00 PM
To the Editor:
Port Coquitlam residents witnessed a number of healthy, mature trees being removed from Veterans Park and Leigh Square in Port Coquitlam on March 15 and 16, with more still to come down.
Many passersby expressed shock, dismay, and even anxiety at seeing the big trees fall.
In addition to enhancing Port Coquitlam's "small town" charm, these urban trees provided a welcome habitat for birds and other small wildlife species.
Seniors could often be seen resting on the benches and chatting under the shade of the flowering cherry trees along Shaughnessy Street.
Trees buffer city noises, calm our senses, and are good for our mental health.
Healthy, mature trees also provide valuable ecosystem services including helping to cool our cities during increasingly hot weather and summer heat domes.
During wet weather and atmospheric rivers, the same trees help to manage storm-water run-off and mitigate risk of flooding.
Trees produce life-giving oxygen, take up carbon, and filter out air pollutants.
Twenty-one trees in total are slated for removal in this portion of the project. Approximately 40 "replacement" trees will be planted.
However, it's worth noting that urban trees reach their most productive point in terms of providing ecological services between the ages of 60 to 150 years, depending on the tree species and health.
Many of the trees which are being removed are just coming into their most productive years.
High-level public consultation was carried out on the development plan, but confusion and lack of clarity remained with respect to tree retention.
Environmental groups were excluded as stakeholders in the consultation process and information was not made publicly available regarding which trees were to be removed.
Too many of these decisions are currently being made behind closed doors and too many voices are being silenced.
As we continue to grapple with the effects of both a global pandemic and the climate crisis, retention of healthy, mature urban trees is more important than ever.
Port Coquitlam mayor and council: It's time to stop paving paradise.
Dr. Nancy H. Furness
on behalf of Wondrous Tree Fellowship
(PLEASE NOTE: Though I am still too traumatized to write about this in any detail, just let me say that ALL the mature trees were removed from the downtown. There is not ONE SINGLE TREE left in the town centre of Old Port Coquitlam, not even a sapling. The magnificent flowering cherry trees, at least fifty years old and just at their peak of blossoming, were ALL ripped out. The entire character of the downtown has been ruined, and cannot come back. The fabled "replanting" cannot happen, because every square inch of the downtown has been paved over. There is nothing but a sea of cement, solid concrete with no end, NO earth to plant anything, not even any grass! The lovely tulip garden in front of the City Hall has been paved over. This is called "improvement", and it was done for no good reason, except perhaps commerce. When I first saw it, reacting with shock and horror, I thought, they must be widening the road. But no. Diseased trees? No, not at all. It is to "beautify" and "improve" the area around Old City Hall, considered the most beautiful landmark and most famous tourist attraction in Port Coquitlam. And it has been ruined forever. I will assume the promised "replanting" cannot be done unless it is very small trees in cement pots by the side of the road.)
Saturday, April 23, 2022
Thursday, April 21, 2022
BIZARRE DANCE ROUTINE on 1950s TV VARIETY SHOW
Tuesday, April 19, 2022
Sunday, April 17, 2022
Saturday, April 16, 2022
Friday, April 15, 2022
"BLACKBIRD, FLY!" I follow a handsome wild bird on Blakeburn Lagoon
💥LOOK OUT!! Announcer is HYSTERICAL over OCTOPUS ATTACK!😳
Thursday, April 14, 2022
GOT MY MOJO WORKING: Yarn Dolls!
Monday, April 11, 2022
😲The Troll Doll Channel: 😮HELP! MY TROLLS HAVE TAKEN OVER!😲
Thursday, April 7, 2022
Camera falls from airplane and lands in pig pen--MUST WATCH END!!
Wednesday, April 6, 2022
TEN! THOUSAND! SUBSCRIBERS!!!
You Have Never Heard Capybaras Sound Like This. Extraordinary Sound of 2...
Tuesday, April 5, 2022
The Great Capybara Bamboo Chase グレートカピバラバンブーチェイス 大水豚竹追逐
😊The Troll Doll Channel: UNBOXING of WISHNIK, "MUTINY" in TROLLANDIA, an...
Sunday, April 3, 2022
Friday, April 1, 2022
Leon Scott's COMPLETE DISCOGRAPHY 1853 - 1860
First Sounds strives to make humanity's earliest sound recordings available to all people for all time.
First Sounds seeks out the world's oldest sound recordings—wherever they are.
We rewrote history in 2008 when we discovered and resurrected humanity’s first recordings of its own voice, created in 1860 in Paris by Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville. Since then, we have identified and played back even older recordings. First Sounds remains the authority on Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville and his recordings.
First Sounds is dedicated to audio preservation.
We have digitally preserved every airborne sound recording known to exist from before 1861, plus many recordings made thereafter.
First Sounds pioneered the playback of the oldest sound recordings in 2007 and has been in the forefront ever since.
Sound recordings made before the invention of the phonograph were not intended to be played back. Extracting their sounds remains our specialty.
First Sounds is collaborative.
David Giovannoni, Patrick Feaster, Meagan Hennessey, and Richard Martin founded First Sounds in 2007 to facilitate, coordinate, and promote the efforts of individuals who share their passions and of organizations that share their goals. First Sounds is unincorporated; we neither solicit nor accept financial donations.
First Sounds offers free and universal access to its work.
We believe humanity's earliest sound recordings are the patrimony of all mankind. We present them here under a Creative Commons Attribution (BY) license which conveys certain privileges and responsibilities. We encourage everyone everywhere to study and enjoy them.
Email us at info@firstsounds.org.